Even in less than fifty pages, the readings this week make it clear that China is undergoing an economic and institutional revolution driven by changes in policies and norms. Both Wallace’s “The New Normal: A Neopolitical Turn in China’s Reform Era” and Minzner’s “China After the Reform Era” show that since Mao, China has undergone numerous changes, but perhaps the greatest and most impactful changes are those that have been promulgated by the current Chinese leader Xi Jinping. According to Minzner, Xi Jinping has succeeded in recreated a Mao-like popularity, becoming a personalistic ruler. While Minzer focuses a lot on Xi Jinping’s image in Chinese society as a backbone for his popular support, Wallace focuses instead on the reforms that have been led by Xi Jinping in China, and the effects that these decisions have had on both maintaining the Chinese economy and ensuring that the Chinese regime has legitimate claims to power.
Wallace argues that the first of two important changes seen under Xi Jinping is the centralization of power. The drive for this is represented in the new power and popularity of the Party’s Central Commission for Discipline Inspection (CCDI). The most important aspect of the CCDI’s rejuvenation in China is the fact that it is now prosecuting high ranking Party officials. This is something that Xi Jinping has done not only to secure political power against his competitors, but also to help legitimize the state while targeting corruption.
The second of these important changes is a change in the perspective of the politicians, more specifically in the goals that they have as those in power have switched from the technocrats of the past to those belonging to the neopolitical wave that is currently sweeping the nation. While Minzner also mentions the new political and power dynamics in China, he focuses more on the economic future of the regime, and the effects that the decisions of past leaders will have on Xi Jinping’s ability to react.
As someone who has little background knowledge in China, I thought that the most interesting parts of each of this week’s readings were not the author’s analysis of the Chinese economy or predictions on the future of Chinese politics, but rather that both author’s allude to the fact that Xi Jinping is operating via self-reflection, not only on his past decisions but on the past decisions of all authoritarian leaders. This is more prevalent in the Minzer article. On multiple occasions Minzer mentions that Xi Jinping’s decisions, and the decisions of many Chinese leaders, were motivated by the failures of the Soviet Union. An example of this can be seen in the decision to encourage retirement from leadership positions, to spark economic development, and to maintain a Party that, for the most part, views the people within its borders as equals. As this class comes to a close, it is both rewarding and concerning to know that Authoritarian rulers are using what we’ve learned as motivators for their decisions; that the topics and case studies we’ve been discussing are not just theory on paper.